Netherlands beat England 1-0 to enter men’s hockey World Cup final
14 06 2014
|
|||||||||
|
Edit : Edit
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Categories : Uncategorized
Peralta scores in Mexico’s 1-0 win over Cameroon
14 06 2014
|
Mexico
performing netter with control over the ball with lack of punch for
goal two sides Mexico and Cameroon Shrugging off two contentious
off-side calls in the first half, a tenacious Mexico rode on Oribe
Peralta’s solitary second half strike to beat Cameroon 1-0 in a Group A
World Cup match in Natal on Friday.
The first half was barren despite the ball finding the back of the
net thrice with Mexico forward Giovani dos Santos being the victim of
two debatable off-side calls from the assistant referees. However,
persistence paid and Peralta’s 61st minute strike meant that Mexico have
beaten an African side in World Cup finals for the first time. Santos,
former Barcelona playmaker, could not score a goal but he did set up one
for his side. Hector Herrera sent a pass to Santos, who shot the ball
between the two defenders. Cameroon custodian Charles Itandje failed to
stop the powerful strike and Peralta latched on to the deflection and
put the rebound in. Mexico were clearly the dominant side from the start
with their pacy attack but their defence looked shaky. Santos was
denied goals in the 10th and 31st minutes. Striker Hector Herrara sent
in a perfect cross from the right and Santos, dodging his marker,
volleyed home but the official ruled it off-side. A rapturous crowd fell
silent. Six minutes later, Cameroon legend Samuel Eto’o found the net
from a corner but this time the linesman’s decision was beyond doubt. It
was clear off-side. Eto’o had a superb chance to put the African the
side ahead but he hit wide after receiving the ball from Benoit
Assou-Ekotto, who broke into the Mexico box from the left before cutting
a low ball back. Suddenly, Mexico looked shaky in defence as their
defence dealt with a few raids. In the 31st minute, Santos could not
believe his luck as he and Mexico were denied for the second time by the
linesman’s flag again. A perfect corner was curled towards the far
post, where an unmarked Santos nodded the ball in. But the joy gave way
to frustration as linesman showed the flag. Those decisions did little
to appease a Mexican media which cried foul after seeing Group A
opponents Brazil awarded a questionable penalty in a 3-1 win over
Croatia on Thursday. But against Cameroon, whose pre-World Cup was
marred by a bitter row over bonuses, Mexico were a class apart. After a
cagey start at a sodden Estadio das Dunas, Giovani Dos Santos appeared
to have opened Mexico’s account when he first-timed Miguel Layun’s
delivery past Cameroon ‘keeper Charles Itandje inside the quarter hour.
But despite replays showing the Villarreal striker to be onside, the
goal was chalked off by Colombian referee Wilmar Roldan. Cameroon did
not sight goal until minutes later when Eric Choupo-Moting tapped past
‘keeper Guillermo Ochoa after the ball had been headed back into the box
following a corner only to be ruled off side. Cameroon eventually
settled and Stephane M’Bia flashed a header wide from Alexandre Song’s
corner on 18 minutes. The Africans spurned a far better chance when
Tottenham defender Benoit Assou-Ekotto finished off a mazy run down the
left to deliver for Samuel Eto’o, but the Chelsea striker saw his
first-time shot flash wide. Mexico remained a constant threat and when
Choupo-Moting brought down Francisco Rodriguez to hand Mexico a free
kick the Cameroon defence was caught unawares. With the goal at their
mercy, Rafael Marquez and Hector Moreno collided at the back post to see
the ball go wide. Mexico had the ball in the net for a second time when
Dos Santos flashed a header past Itandje at the back post following a
corner, although it too was waved off by Roldan. Cameroon coach Volker
Finke replaced defender Cedric Djeugoue with Dany Nounkeu for the start
of the second half, but the African side were soon under pressure.
Barely a minute after the restart Itandje was forced to block from
Peralta as the Santos Laguna striker jumped on to Dos Santos’s smart
dink. At the other end, Choupo-Moting saw a deflected shot come off the
the foot of defender Francisco Rodriguez as Ochoa collected with ease.
Cameroon threatened on 53 minutes when a curling free kick by
Assou-Ekotto, following Hector Moreno’s foul on M’Bia, took a deflection
off the Mexican wall to send Ochoa the wrong way but the ball flew
wide. Mexico finally had the ball in the net, this time for good, just
after the hour when Dos Santos saw his low drive parried by Itandje and
into the path of Peralta, who drove home from 10 metres out to send the
largely Mexican crowd of 39,216 into raptures. Coach Herrera replaced
midfielder Andres Guardado with Marco Fabian and minutes later
Manchester United forward Javier Hernandez came on in place of Peralta. A
chorus of ‘Ole’ began to ring around the stadium as the Mexicans took
control, and in the final 10 minutes Hernandez chased deep in
Cameroonian territory to cut back for Fabian, who was blocked by a
defender. Cameroon threatened in the final five minutes when Eto’o sent
Benjamin Moukandjo through on the right but the Nancy midfielder’s drive
across goal was blocked by an alert Rodriguez. Mexico had Ochoa to
thank in the final two minutes when the ‘keeper pulled off a spectacular
dive to parry Moukandjo’s header from Assou-Ekotto’s delivery. However
Mexico almost made it two at the death when Layun dispossessed a
Cameroon defender to deliver for Hernandez, who volleyed just over.
Edit : Edit
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Categories : sports, Uncategorized
WC 2014 Netherlands thrash world champions Spain 5-1
14 06 2014
Dutch captain Robin van Persie and Arjen Robben gave splendid
start with each goal breaking Spain’s World Cup defence as the
Netherlands destroyed one of the tournament favourites 5-1 in Group B on
Friday.
|
|
|
|
Robin
van Persie and Arjen Robben scored twice each as the Netherlands
avenged their 2010 World Cup final defeat to Spain with a record 5-1
drubbing of the defending champions on Friday.
|
|
Van Persie pounced in each half as the Dutch recovered from a
controversial Xabi Alonso penalty to inflict a crushing defeat on the
reigning kings of world and European football.
Stefan De Vrij got the Netherlands’ other goal as Spain slumped to the heaviest defeat ever inflicted at a World Cup on the reigning champions. It was Spain’s worst defeat in more than half a century, coming 51 years after a 6-2 defeat to Scotland in 1963. Thousands of fans gathered in Madrid to watch the game on giant screens were left stunned into silence by the rout. The extraordinary Group B drama in the northern Brazilian coastal city of Salvador has potentially turned the World Cup permutations on their head. If Spain fail to recover the form which saw them win back-to-back European titles either side of their 2010 World Cup triumph, they could conceivably crash out in the first round, or face a daunting clash with Brazil in the last 16. The walloping eclipsed more refereeing controversies on the second day of competition. FIFA officials earlier defended Japanese referee Yuichi Nishimura after he awarded Brazil a bitterly contested penalty in their opening game victory over Croatia. Referees chief Massimo Busacca insisted Nishimura had been justified in awarding the spot-kick after an alleged foul by Dejan Lovren on Brazilian striker Fred. “He had a very good position,” said Busacca, referring to a photo of the incident which appeared to show Lovren’s hands making contact with Fred. “When he saw the hands doing something he makes it (the decision).” But no sooner had referees chief Busacca sprung to Nishimura’s defence then the standard of officiating was again under scrutiny as Mexico took on Cameroon. |
Edit : Edit
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Categories : Uncategorized
In stormy weather Trees Tip endangering life & property
14 06 2014Edit : Edit
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Categories : Uncategorized
Strengthen Exports, Not Just Rupee
14 06 2014Edit : Edit
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Categories : Uncategorized
Vuelve el Día E! / E-Day is coming!
14 06 2014Edit : Edit
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Categories : Uncategorized
Ashok Leyland receives an order for 2,200 buses from the Government
14 06 2014Chennai, June 13th 2014: The Government of Sri Lanka has placed an order for 2,200 buses with Ashok Leyland. This is the one of the largest purchase by the Sri Lankan Transport Board (SLTB), as the Government aims to modernise its existing fleet and significantly improve the country’s public transport network.
Ashok Leyland will supply these 2200 buses within the next six months. With this latest order, Ashok Leyland reinforces its position as the market leader in Sri Lanka and as an important stake holder in Sri Lankan transport.
Commenting on the new order, Vinod K. Dasari, Managing Director, Ashok Leyland said, “This is a huge order especially at a time when the domestic market is just about to bounce back. This order reaffirms our strategy to substantially enhance our sales outside India”.
Edit : Edit
Comments : Leave a comment
Categories : Uncategorized
LOUNGE PASS APPOINTS AVIAREPS AS ITS REPRESENTATIVE IN INDIA
14 06 2014Mumbai 13thJune 2014: Lounge Pass, an affordable airport VIP indulgence, has appointed AVIAREPS as its India representative office at Mumbai and has already begun accepting registrations. This new marketing endeavor has generated a fantastic response from the Travel Trade Industry as it now allows agents to sell airport lounges to their customers, bundling it with airline tickets.
Travel agents can now have their customers enjoy the most satisfying experience of their holidays much before they reach their destination. Lounge Pass offers a peaceful getaway from the chaotic frenzy at most airports worldwide at affordable prices as you await your connecting flight. With over 200 airport VIP lounges worldwide, Lounge Pass pampers you with that extra touch of luxury to your next trip and makes your journey pleasantly unforgettable.
Prices start from as little as US$13.50 and vary by destination & amenities. When travel agents book a lounge , they can select an airport and a lounge of their choice and the costs (including those for children where permitted) will be displayed accordingly. Lounge Pass can be pre booked and paid for online via a secure network connection using one of the following cards – Visa, Visa Delta, MasterCard or American Express. Lounge Pass is unique in offering online service for lounges, providing immediate confirmation of reservation.
Says Mr. Joseph Fernandes- General Manager AVIAREPS India, “Lounge Pass now allows economy passengers to avail of luxury VIP lounges while transiting airports around the world, enjoy drinks and snacks, stay connected with Wi-Fi and work stations, pass the time with newspapers, TV and magazines and above all enjoy the peace and tranquility it offers. Some Lounges even offer Spa treatments and massages at very nominal charges.”
For further Information Contact:
AVIAREPS Aviation, Tourism & Travel Marketing Pvt Ltd
Tel: 91-22-42163131
E-mail : india@aviareps.com
Edit : Edit
Comments : Leave a comment
Categories : Uncategorized
अखिलेश सरकार की दलितों के प्रति सं
14 06 2014Edit : Edit
Comments : Leave a comment
Categories : Uncategorized
Shanti Bhushan statement on Mumbai’s Campa Cola residents
14 06 2014
Shanti Bhushan statement on Mumbai’s Campa Cola residents
From: Media Cell AAP1 <mediacellaap1@gmail.com> Fri, 13 Jun ’14
4:20p To: undisclosed-recipients:;Show full Headers
Friday, June 13
One of India’s seniormost lawyers and former union law minister, Shanti Bhushan, also the founding member of the Aam Aadmi Party, has issued the following statement on the plight of the Campa Cola Society residents of Mumbai :
Campa Cola Society of India – responsibility of the State
While the Supreme Court judgment of February 2013, refusing to interfere with non-regularization of many flats in the Campa Cola Society, built by contravening the applicable legal provisions cannot be faulted in law in any manner, the case raises many important issues of constitutional importance, which must determine the state’s responsibility in such situations, which are likely to arise in a large number of similar matters all over India.
It appears from a reading of the judgment of the SC, that a large number of flats were illegally constructed, by the builder in connivance with the relevant authorities, which has been the norm all over India for many decades.
The flat owners and their families have been living in these illegally constructed flats for 25 years or so. Having read the judgment, it does not show that the continuance of these flats would be harmful to public interest in any manner.
It is true that violation of law should not be encouraged, but there are many reasons why people, particularly poor people, are compelled to become parties to various illegalities just to be able to survive in this country.
While nobody can have any objection if the builder and the various authorities conniving in the illegalities were punished, but the question is whether demolition of hundreds of flats can be the response of the state in such situations.
Let us not forget that we have established a republic in India. Under Article 38 of the Constitution, in Part 4, relating to directive principles of state policy, the state is required to “strive to promote the welfare of the people”, and Article 37 declares, that the Directive Principles are fundamental to the governance of the country, and it shall be the duty of the state to apply these directive principles in the making of the laws.
These flats in Campa Cola Society buildings are providing much needed shelter to hundreds of families. Hundreds of tonnes of steel, cement, and other valuable material, which are assets belonging to the nation, have gone into the construction of these hundreds of flats, though illegally constructed. Unless the continued existence of these flats poses any significant harm to any public interest, would it not be the duty of the state to protect these flats from demolition, and the occupant’s families from eviction?
What is the state’s duty on the promotion of public welfare? After reading the SC judgment, I posed a question to myself: If this situation had arisen in 1977, when I was the Law Minister, what would I have done? I have no hesitation in saying that I would have persuaded the Morarji cabinet to immediately issue an ordinance to stay the eviction and demolition and providing for the constitution of a committee to go into the question of whether the non-demolition of the flats and the non-eviction of the residents would pose any danger of any kind to any significant public interest.
The committee would also go into the penalty to be levied on the builder/residents and any prosecution required under the law of the builder and the authorities, to discourage such illegal constructions in the future. The ordinance would contain the usual clauses, that the provisions of the ordinance would operate, “notwithstanding any judgment of the SC, or any authority under any law”.
We must always remember that life is a great struggle and it is the constitutional duty of all organs and institutions that have been set up by the people for their welfare, to perform their functions and exercise their powers, to help people in their life’s struggles, rather than create obstacles in their life. (ENDS)
Regards
AAP Media Cell
Friday, June 13
One of India’s seniormost lawyers and former union law minister, Shanti Bhushan, also the founding member of the Aam Aadmi Party, has issued the following statement on the plight of the Campa Cola Society residents of Mumbai :
Campa Cola Society of India – responsibility of the State
While the Supreme Court judgment of February 2013, refusing to interfere with non-regularization of many flats in the Campa Cola Society, built by contravening the applicable legal provisions cannot be faulted in law in any manner, the case raises many important issues of constitutional importance, which must determine the state’s responsibility in such situations, which are likely to arise in a large number of similar matters all over India.
It appears from a reading of the judgment of the SC, that a large number of flats were illegally constructed, by the builder in connivance with the relevant authorities, which has been the norm all over India for many decades.
The flat owners and their families have been living in these illegally constructed flats for 25 years or so. Having read the judgment, it does not show that the continuance of these flats would be harmful to public interest in any manner.
It is true that violation of law should not be encouraged, but there are many reasons why people, particularly poor people, are compelled to become parties to various illegalities just to be able to survive in this country.
While nobody can have any objection if the builder and the various authorities conniving in the illegalities were punished, but the question is whether demolition of hundreds of flats can be the response of the state in such situations.
Let us not forget that we have established a republic in India. Under Article 38 of the Constitution, in Part 4, relating to directive principles of state policy, the state is required to “strive to promote the welfare of the people”, and Article 37 declares, that the Directive Principles are fundamental to the governance of the country, and it shall be the duty of the state to apply these directive principles in the making of the laws.
These flats in Campa Cola Society buildings are providing much needed shelter to hundreds of families. Hundreds of tonnes of steel, cement, and other valuable material, which are assets belonging to the nation, have gone into the construction of these hundreds of flats, though illegally constructed. Unless the continued existence of these flats poses any significant harm to any public interest, would it not be the duty of the state to protect these flats from demolition, and the occupant’s families from eviction?
What is the state’s duty on the promotion of public welfare? After reading the SC judgment, I posed a question to myself: If this situation had arisen in 1977, when I was the Law Minister, what would I have done? I have no hesitation in saying that I would have persuaded the Morarji cabinet to immediately issue an ordinance to stay the eviction and demolition and providing for the constitution of a committee to go into the question of whether the non-demolition of the flats and the non-eviction of the residents would pose any danger of any kind to any significant public interest.
The committee would also go into the penalty to be levied on the builder/residents and any prosecution required under the law of the builder and the authorities, to discourage such illegal constructions in the future. The ordinance would contain the usual clauses, that the provisions of the ordinance would operate, “notwithstanding any judgment of the SC, or any authority under any law”.
We must always remember that life is a great struggle and it is the constitutional duty of all organs and institutions that have been set up by the people for their welfare, to perform their functions and exercise their powers, to help people in their life’s struggles, rather than create obstacles in their life. (ENDS)
Regards
AAP Media Cell
Edit : Edit
Comments : Leave a comment
Categories : Uncategorized
Make Delhi’s emergency electricity restoration plan public
14 06 2014From: AAP MEDIA CELL <aapmediacell8@gmail.com> Fri, 13 Jun ’14 5:51p To: undisclosed-recipients:;Show full Headers
Friday, June 13
The Aam Aadmi Party demands that the union power ministry and the Delhi administration should immediately make public their emergency electricity restoration plan to ensure there would be no long power cuts in the national capital.
It is a matter of grave concern that even two weeks after the May 30 thunderstorm, which the power department officials are blaming for the destruction of power cables and towers, no concrete action plan to prevent such a situation from arising in the future, appears to be in place.
Though there appears to be some merit in the statement of union power minister Mr Piyush Goyal that lack of investment in infrastructure for last 10 years during former chief minister Sheila Dikshit’s regime is responsible for the weak network of electricity transmission and distribution, but what is beyond understanding is his complete silence on the functioning of private power distribution companies (discoms).
What is worrying is the complete lack of accountability in the functioning of the power department and the unexplained hesitation to fix the responsibility for the long power cuts which made the life of the people miserable in scorching heat.
The silence of both, the BJP and the Congress on the functioning of discoms and their inability to ensure uninterrupted power supply, gives rise to reasonable apprehension about their close relations with these discoms.
Comments